May24

BPGlobalPR: A Brandjacker Strikes Again

by Heather Whaling

Have you seen @BPGlobalPR? It’s a feed of sarcastic, witty, sometimes inappropriate tweets from a fake BP PR person. If you take a few minutes and look at the stream of tweets, it’s obviously satire. But, a quick search shows that more than a few people don’t get the joke — and instead believe these 140-character bits come from an real-life PR person representing BP. And, the account is rapidly gaining followers (probably because the tweets are actually funny … if the situation wasn’t so sad). Over the weekend, when John Taylor wrote about the account, it had 900 followers. As of Monday morning? 7,346. (And, look at this screenshot. The retweet rates are high!) Update: As of Tuesday (5/25) afternoon, the account has 25,500+ followers.

Brandjacking is nothing new — remember the Heinz Twitter imposter? The person posing as an official Heinz rep was sharing good news and had developed a base of Heinz fans. Presumably at the request of Heinz, Twitter changed the profile name from @HJHeinz to @Not_HJHeinz. I thought Heinz could have worked with him to continue to share company news, perhaps in a non-official capacity. After all, he had developed a pretty strong following of people interested in Heinz.

But, this BP situation is different. BP is in the midst of a huge crisis — environmental, legal, reputation, etc. And, it’s easy to see how they may not find the humor in these tweets. Also, the account seems to violate Twitter’s terms of service (misusing a trademarked logo, not clearly identifying a parody as such). Should BP request the account be suspended? Would clearly indicating that the account is a parody be enough? What if BP just ignores the account?

If you worked for BP, how would you respond?

TIP: If you want to take steps to help prevent your own brand from being hijacked, use a service like knowem.com. It’s impossible to protect against every potential situation, but this is a good place to start.

•••

Like what you’re reading? Please consider subscribing to the blog.

  • Julie
    You guys, people aren't idiots. People know BPglobalPR is satire. It is so easy for Americans to allow themselves to be placated by the style of half-hearted PR spin that BP has been doing.

    The awareness that BPglobalPR is bringing to this horrible tragedy (which will likely literally be the worst environmental disaster in our lifetimes) is important, much more important than BP's brand image.

    People are angry, people do not have the tools to deal with something this big. BP deserves to take the hit for this, they need to own up and fix what they've done, and Twitter feeds like this (whether they violate TOS or not) are both requesting that and offering people a way to cope.

    http://streetgiant.com/2010/06/02/leroy-stick-the-man-behind-bpglobalpr/
  • heatherwhaling
    Agree, people aren't idiots. :) But, if you look at the tweets responding to the account, especially when it was first created, it's clear that a number of people didn't realize that the account was a fake. The bigger issue now is recovery. And, kudos to BPGlobalPR for making such a significant donation to help with the effort. Enough PR spin and political posturing. We all need to focus on doing whatever we can to help in the recovery and clean-up efforts.
  • Looks like BP set up a new facebook page in response to Twitter: http://www.facebook.com/stoptheoilspill
  • Not a fan of BP
    I worked for BP.

    They're business model is built on three tiers (1) Distribution, (2) Mining and Exploration, and I always forget 3. When going through training to become the owner of a BP franchise, they emphasized they're favoritism on Mining and Exploration and how the Distribution branch (where my franchise came from) could die and they would be ok.

    It's kinda ironic that now the EPA is thinking of severely restricting their drilling on American public soil. Guess they're lucky they didn't kill distribution off. It may be all they have left!
  • I really have an issue overall with anyone who would use satire in a tragedy such as this. This is tantamount to making satire of 9/11. From BP's POV, they have not demonstrated any ability to address this from a PR standpoint. They are getting destroyed by the media and I really feel bad for them.
  • Hah. They're getting destroyed by the media because they're responsible for one of the largest environmental disasters in history. You think shutting down @BPGlobalPR is going to make that better?

    BTW, the content is *clearly* parodic to anyone with a lick of common sense, and the logo has been changed to a defaced version.
  • heatherwhaling
    This was a broader conversation about PR and brand management in a
    crisis. Clearly, BP responding to or ignoring the account won't impact
    the way the media covers the story.

    As for whether it's a clear parady, it is if you read the whole
    stream. Some of the tweets are pretty obvious. But, if you just see a
    random one in the midst
    of hundreds of other tweets -- that could be a different story.
    Especially early on, there were *lots* of people who missed the joke
    at first. And, that's why we were talking about this in terms of a PR
    situation.

    Thanks for chiming in.
  • heatherwhaling
    You raise a good point, Jonathan. It *is* a tragedy. What's the line between making fun of BP's response and just being inappropriate? And, how does that factor into the way BP approaches the situation?
  • BP should be the first one in line to tell the world that this account is absolutely unacceptable and that this needs to end. BP needs to take the position of the people who are up in arms over this tragedy.
  • BP should request that the page description be revised so that people know its a fake page. Btw, the page is hysterical :)
  • The tweets are indeed funny, but did you notice that the primary purpose seems to be pushing $25 "BP cares" T-shirts. They promise to donate the money to charities involved w/ cleanup, but how can one be sure?

    If I were BP, I'd ask to have the feed shut down or at least renamed as "Fake_BPGlobalPR". Although it may be too late for this - one of their tweets is a "Top Tweet" with 100+ retweets, and comes up on top if you click on "oil spill" trending topic.

    In short, it's a bad time to be in the real "BP Global PR": lose-lose situation whatever action you take.
  • heatherwhaling
    I'd be willing to bet that the money isn't going to a "real" charity, but what do I know ...

    Interestingly, I just noticed that Michael Moore just started RT-ing the posts -- and isn't sharing that they're fake. Again, it doesn't take a lot of research to conclude it's a fake account, but you never know ... it's easy to see how one of his followers could take this as a real account.

    I agree with you -- BP legal needs to get involved and at least have it clearly identified as not a real official account. I've read other blog posts (to be fair, written when there were far fewer followers) that said BP should leave this alone. But, this is the perfect illustration of why you can't leave this alone. Companies can't control everything that's said about them; however, they do still have control in some situations. And, protecting their brand image and "likeness" is one of those.

    Thanks for commenting :)
  • Amy
  • On a side note, @BPGlobalPR has twice as many followers as @BP_America as of Monday May 24. And they are doing a better job at responding to ppl. I commented (politely) on twitter to @BP_America that I could not view the web cam video on their site, and (as expected) there was zero response.

    Maybe a good #pr20chat question: how interactive brands should be on social media at times of crisis? Does it hurt to maintain a broadcast only outlet? Or is it a wise move?
  • heatherwhaling
    Ksenia, that's a great idea! We were planning on focusing on crisis communication tomorrow anyway. This aligns perfectly! Thanks for the suggested question :) See you on the chat tomorrow!
  • kmskala
    Be honest folks, does it really surprise you that this account is still active? After the PR mess they've gotten themselves into outside of the non-traditional space, I'm not surprised this has gone on as long as it has. Clearly, anyone with any sort of PR common sense & digital awareness would have had this account terminated a long time ago. This isn't a BP_Sucks account or anything like that. It's clearly someone pretending to be BP. As mentioned above, a clear violation of TOS and it needs to be brought to a hault.

    Where do they go from here? Honestly, I don't know that they'll do much online, other than what they've done thus far. Maybe a little here and there on their website, but I doubt they'll take this brandjack seriously. It's a shame, too. I haven't bothered to check out other SM sites, but again, it wouldn't surprise me if it's more of a one-way push tactic rather than a true dialouge.

    Their entire PR efforts are a joke. The way they've handled the entire oil spill situation was horrible and should be a case study on what NOT to do. How to combat this online snapfu? I don't even know where to begin - partially because I'm not getting paid to do so, and partially because I wouldn't take them on as a client.

    Lesson(s) learned: Don't spill oil, don't pass the blame....and monitor the online chatter.
  • heatherwhaling
    Ha! Love this comment ... and love the lessons. Spot on. Nothing to add here. You covered it all :)
  • I saw this the other day and was shocked at the number of people that were obviously taking it seriously. You guys have to remind that there are a surprising number of people that lack the ability to see satire even when it's slapping them in the face.

    It is clearly in violation of TOS and should be taken down. At the same time, I will be extremely sad to see an end to these tweets that they're producing.
  • LindsTR
    Heather,

    Hopefully it's obvious to people on Twitter (and beyond) that the account isn't real. It wouldn't make much sense for BP to monitor it because every tweet is a joke, so it's not as though they would be keeping track of what's bad and what's good.

    I'm not sure why Twitter hasn't suspended the account, but would it look worse for BP if they requested themselves that Twitter suspend it? Like Kelly said, I'm sure their resources are tied up at the moment, and they aren't incredibly worried about the phony account. While it seems obvious to us that BP should be concerned about what's going on on Twitter, there are still a lot of people out there who aren't involved in social media (I'm referring to BP stakeholders, not BP), and BP probably realizes that.

    With that being said, the company does have an official Twitter account, @BP_America, even though it appears to be one-way communication. @Oil_Spill_2010 (although not directly BP's account) seems to do a better job.

    Lindsey
  • heatherwhaling
    Lindsey, totally agree that BP has a lot of target markets to deal with at this point -- and many of them aren't on Twitter. But, we all know how fast information can spread from Twitter to other outlets. The BPGlobalPR account is getting hundreds of RTs, and not all of those people realize it's a fake account. What happens if a reporter or prominent blogger doesn't realize it's a fake and RTs it? Pandora's box ...

    I'm interested in the legal aspect of this, too. It'll most definitely be interesting to follow! Thanks for commenting! :)
  • KDMisevich
    Great post! This is a good example of what happens when you aren't engaging in the conversation, others have it for you. I am shocked that BP hasn't stepped in to stop this brandjacking.

    It is understandable that BP's PR resources are tied up and BP might be unable to manage something as damaging as a false Twitter account, but it might be time to hire some outside help.
  • heatherwhaling
    Kelly, you're totally right -- BP's PR/SM resources I'm sure are way overworked. :) I'd think this would fall into a legal issue though. Whoever is running this account is using the BP logo, which is trademarked. I'd think BP could shut it down, or at least require them to change the image and handle, because of that. It's such a slippery slope though. Does BP risk more negative PR if they're seen as the "big, bad corporation" wasting time on a Twitter joke in the midst of a catastrophe?
  • Nice post, Heather!

    I saw this account a few days ago and I honestly don't understand why it hasn't been suspended yet. Like you mention, it clearly seems to violate Twitter's Terms of Use, so unless BP isn't aware of this account, I can't image why they'd want this brandjacking to continue. It's not like BP is in the best favor with the public and this account isn't helping the company's reputation in ANY way, even though it is an imposter. Many people don't understand that. By that lack of understanding, BP's already tarnished rep is just negatively influenced even more.

    Since BP is in the middle of such crisis on many fronts, I think that they need to somehow request to suspend this account immediately. Whether or not they want to indicate that the account was a parody after that is their choice.
  • heatherwhaling
    I'm surprised, too, that no action has been taken. However, I've heard stories about Twitter being slow to respond, so perhaps that's part of the issue? BP can't suspend the account, but they could request Twitter suspend or alter the user name. Going back to the HJHeinz example, Twitter added the "not" in front of his handle. I'd think something as simple as that could easily be done with this account and then it becomes very clear that it is in fact a parody, right?
  • The situation makes me wonder...

    Any chance Twitter is taking a bit of a personal stand and acting slowly because they think BP kind of deserves it? Like you said, Heather, it's a simple fix on Twitter's end and this thing is gaining popularity. Wouldn't that generally create some urgency if somebody was being wrongfully impersonated?

    (or if you want to go the conspiracy theorist route - maybe BP is looking for some sympathy as if they're being "attacked" in this way on Twitter?)
  • OnlinePRNews
    I was wondering the same thing! It would be a covert way to make a statement without really having to come out and take sides. Sort of a "Why don't we just pretend we don't notice this fake account until someone asks us to take it down."Lol

    In the meantime, as a resident of the Gulf Coast, I find the tweets to be quite entertaining. And if they really do only serve as a means to sell T-shirts, then kudos for a successful viral campaign! -- Tara
  • Scott- I never thought about that. Personally, though, I wouldn't think that BP was being attacked or feel sorry for them but I know there are people who would. I would still think that they'd like to see this account stopped, even if they are playing like they are being "attacked" to look like the good guys (if you will).

    It seems like a simple enough fix on Twitter's end, even just adding the "Not" in front of the handle would be better than nothing at this point like Heather said. You point about Twitter taking a personal stand in this and taking their time in rectifying the situation is a good though. I'm very interested in seeing how this plays out.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post:

Next post: