prTini

prTini

1 part real life PR, 1 part pop culture, 1 part politics … shaken, not stirred.

As I said earlier, John McCain supporters make me sad. I think it’s disappointing that people think it’s a good idea to vote for a candidate who:

  • Doesn’t admonish supporters who shout “Kill him” in reference to Barack Obama.
  • Refuses to call on his supporters to stop the whisper campaigns perpetuating the lie that Obama is a Muslim
  • Leads voters to believe that criticizing a war is unpatriotic or grounds for treason
  • Repeatedly spreads lies by claiming that Obama “pals around with terrorists”
  • Approves of campaign representatives repeatedly referring to Obama with his middle name. McCain’s not even being subtle anymore about trying to scare voters out of voting for Obama.

I’m not saying that McCain is responsible for the hateful words coming out of his supporters mouths. Clearly, he’s not. However, he is responsible for setting the tone of the campaign. The tone McCain set has led to these kinds of remarks.

Since McCain has no real economic plan, I think it’s safe to assume that many of his supporters either believe he’s a maverick who will take on the system or support his social stances. Let’s get one thing clear: He’s no maverick. Everything — from his limited policy ideas … to the kind of campaign he’s waging — is reminiscent of George W. Bush. And, as for social issues: Is that really what’s most important to the country as a whole? Or, is it more important to select a leader who wants to bring people together — despite religious or other differences? Someone who recognizes and respects the fact that people share different values? Why do voters think it’s a good idea to support a candidate who clearly doesn’t care how he gets to the White House — even if that means insinuating that his oppoenent is racist, unpatriotic, Muslim, in cahoots with Kenyan leaders, just for starters – as long as he gets there?

I’m not articulating this as well as I’d like. But, the point is this: The notion that someone honestly looks at the type of person John McCain is and still decides to cast their vote for him is shameful and sad. What does that say about voters and how we choose our leaders?

Update: The New York Times comments on this as well.

Update 2: My brother just called to discuss this post, which only reinforced that I didn’t communicate what I meant very well. I don’t mean to imply that people who agree with McCain’s policies should be ashamed to vote for him. I don’t agree with those policies, but I certainly believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. All I meant by this post is that I think it’s sad that McCain has given up on offering real policies and ideas that will help move our country forward and is instead trying to scare people into voting for him. I know he can’t control what comes out of people’s mouths, but he’s not doing anything to remedy the situation. Start by telling his “introducers” to stop using Obama’s middle name. Tell Palin to drop the line about palling around with terrorists. Stop using fear to win an election and start using policies and actual ideas for once. Perhaps the title of this post should have more accurately reflected that current undecided voters who pull the lever for McCain because they are scared of Obama (Is he a terrorist? Is he Muslim?) are sad. They are not basing thier decision on policy — there have been relatively few massive policy changes from either candidate recently. Instead, they aren’t smart enough to see past McCain’s political tricks.

5 Responsed To This Post

Subscribes to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif_alt
matt said, October 8th, 2008 at 7:32 pm

The Daily Kos? really? ugh, tell me you don’t own a Che Guevara t-shirt too.

I think you might be blaming McCain a bit much for things that are mostly said by people who happen to support him and not actually said/advocated by McCain. Maybe you should tone up the objectivity a little and realize that it’s politics, and dirty, and both sides have people doing the same sorts of things.

McCain said once that he usually has his aides write his emails for him. This is because his arms were broken in Vietnam and never set right so it is uncomfortable for him to type. Obama took it and spread the word that McCain didn’t even know how to send email. Should he have. Of course, he’s a politician, and a rather dirty one at that. It’s the game.

But to say that McCain supporters just don’t get it seems just as ignorant a claim that of a certain someone we know who claimed that pro-choicers just don’t get it because they put the emphasis on the mom. You should look at the broader picture.

I don’t think McCain is a particularly dirty politician. up until the primary season he was the politician I respected the most. That has dwindled a bit having seen what a bad campaigner he is. But even if it were someone much worse than McCain, some huge, scummy jerk who held McCain’s voting record and positions, I would still vote for them. I’m not picking the person i want to hang out with or who i think is a nice guy. I’m picking the person who has the policies best for this country somewhat regardless of their personality. Protectionism, agricultural subsidies, bit time taxes on businesses or the wealthy all disgust me. So regardless of who happens to run a campaign better, I want the person who I think will bring this country closer to the ideals i have in my head.

The charge could easily be leveled that obama supporters just don’t get it. they don’t get you have to look at the record and that there’s more to a person than how well they campaign.

This is your blog and you are obviously able to say whatever the hell you want. But I sure hope that in the future you remember that just because somebody has difference of opinion doesn’t necessarily mean that person is shameful and sad.

mygif
matt said, October 8th, 2008 at 8:21 pm

I like the update. no complaints here.

I bet you can’t wait for me to start my own blog so you’ll be able to get some comment revenge

mygif_alt
christina said, October 10th, 2008 at 11:58 am

to matt–actually, i didn’t say that pro-choicers don’t get it because they put the focus on the mom, i said that the term pro-life is appropriate instead of anti-abortion because if you are in favor of saving the lives of babies in womb then the focus is on the child, where as the arguments from most pro-choicers are focused about the mother and what she wants and needs. nothing ignorant about that comment, it’s just a fact. so as you can see i check out heather’s blog every now and then…

mygif
matt said, October 10th, 2008 at 1:17 pm

Christina-
While I’m pleased to hear you read Heather’s blog, you should also spend a little time reading your own email. Quoting directly, you said “pro-choicers put the focus on the mother and what she supposedly needs or can’t handle,etc. Those that are pro-life understand that it is not about the mother…” In your own statement you speak as though it is a fact that abortion is not about the mother, and say that pro lifers understand that and therefore pro-choicers do not.

I didn’t say it was ignorant for someone to say that many pro choice arguments focus on the mother, so there was no need for you to try and refute that point. I said it was ignorant to say that abortion is not about the mother. There are good arguments out there for the pro life side, but saying that cases of rape/incest, or finances, or the woman’s desire to do what she wants with her body don’t/shouldn’t factor in at all, and saying that abortion should focus on nothing but the child is ignorant. Perhaps I’m misunderstanding your statement or you meant something different, but your words seems pretty clear cut. And if there was no misunderstanding, then I stand by the accusation of your statement as ignorant.

On a side note, may I suggest in the future that you email me. I don’t want to commandeer Heather’s blog with comments not relating to her posts.

Sorry sis.

mygif_alt
Ebiddulph said, October 11th, 2008 at 12:37 pm

Back to the post…if the candidates would focus on the needs of the people, the needs of the country, and how the U.S. can be a positive influence on world history, we would all be better off. To sink to the levels of playground bullying, name calling and other personal attacks, or to dwell on half-truths and stretched truths is an insult to us all.

Response To This Topic

Please Note: The comment moderation maybe active so there is no need to resubmit your comment