prTini

prTini

1 part real life PR, 1 part pop culture, 1 part politics … shaken, not stirred.

Browsing in Palin

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said Wednesday she would consider serving in the Senate if God gave her the opportunity and Alaskans wanted her to take the job. The state’s senior senator, Republican Ted Stevens, fell behind as the count resumed in his re-election bid.

We still don’t know the official results of the Alaska recount. If Republican Ted Stevens wins, he will likely be forced to resign since he’s a recently convicted felon. As a result, Sarah Palin could run for his vacated seat in a special election. While it looked like Stevens may have received enough votes to win, the Democrat moved ahead around the same time Palin announced that she might be interested in his seat if God and her state wanted her to choose that path. Think this might be God’s funny way of sending Palin a message?

Earlier this week, I received a very interesting response to my post about Michelle Obama being a better role model than Sarah Palin:

I sometimes wonder that if she (Palin) wasn’t a republican and against abortion, wouldn’t the feminists love her?

I spent a lot of time this week thinking about that. What does it mean to be a feminist? To me feminists are people who fight for women to have the same rights and opportunities as men … who want women to be judged on their abilities … who want to end discrimination. Feminists aren’t just tree-hugging hippies. Republicans can be feminists (see: Sen. Susan Collins from Maine or Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison from Texas). Men can be feminists, too.

So, if we agree that Republicans can be feminists, what stops the movement from embracing Palin? I’m not sure someone can be a feminist and oppose abortion — but that’s a totally separate argument. For the purposes of this discussion, let’s set aside the abortion issue. If Palin were pro-choice, would she be embraced by feminists? I don’t think so. Feminists wouldn’t rally around Palin because she was amenable to being used as a pawn. She was okay with her status as a women being used as a political ploy to attract the ultra-conservative female vote. Feminists don’t want their gender to oppress them; nor do feminists want their gender to unfairly advance them. Additionally, consider Palin’s stance on key issues: A feminist wouln’t run with a candidate who opposed the Violence Against Women Act or the Fair Pay Act (both of which McCain opposed).

Palin may have demonstrated the ability to balance a career and family; but that’s not the threshold for judging feminists. (As a side note, feminists also support a woman’s right to choose to be a stay-at-home mom … as long as the husband isn’t forcing her to stay home. It should be a choice — a decision made together.)

So, to answer the original question: There are many reasons — beyond her abortion stance and party affiliation — that keep feminists from embracing Palin.

It’s official. The Atlantic’s Andrew Sullivan points out that new celebrity Joe the Plumber is more accessible than VP nominee Sarah Palin. Joe held his first press conference today … which is more than we can say for Palin.

Yet, she’s the one who is trying to earn votes?? Are we sure about that?

Want to see what the Oval Office would be like if — God-forbid — Sarah Palin were ever to become president? This site gives you a preview: www.palinaspresident.com.

Spend some time on it. Click on various images … and make sure your volume is turned up. You don’t want to miss hearing Palin wondering what happened to Russia! Also, click on the windows and the door a few times to see different images. It’s frightening. Also, scroll over the Miss Wasilla banner. Have fun exploring … and keep your fingers crossed that she’ll never get closer to the Oval Office than this!

She may not bring much to this campaign — beyond perpetuating racially charged, outright lies – but Palin deserves credit for Saturday Night Live’s resurgence. Whatever they are paying Tina Fey, it’s not enough. This is a classic SNL skit!

I’m a PR person. I can spot a talking point a mile away (I write them for a living). And, Sarah Palin is full of talking points … but not much more. Katie Couric’s interview with Palin and Joe Biden is a perfect illustration of a candidate who understands an issue and can support his beliefs and another candidate who spews talking points without any substance to back it up. Just watch …


Watch CBS Videos Online

Palin would be an embarassment to this country if she were to become VP. You can tell by this interview that she clearly had no idea abot the right to privacy issues wrapped up in Roe vs. Wade. Give me a break. If you’re going to take a stance on an issue — especially one like that — you ought to be able to defend it and understand why the Court voted the way it did.

If last week’s financial mess was crisis enough for McCain to suspend his campagin, what will he do this week? It sounds like this is a bigger crisis — with the bailout failing and no real Plan B on the backburner. Will he suspend his campaign again? Maybe just in time for Palin to skip the Veep debate?

If he doesn’t suspend his campaign this week, what does that say about last week’s suspension? He suspended his campaign as a political trick, or he had good intentions, but — gasp — the stunt polled poorly, so he won’t do it again. Either way, it’s not a “country first” approach.

First, George Will:

Conservatives who insist that electing McCain is crucial usually start, and increasingly end, by saying he would make excellent judicial selections. But the more one sees of his impulsive, intensely personal reactions to people and events, the less confidence one has that he would select judges by calm reflection and clear principles, having neither patience nor aptitude for either.

It is arguable that, because of his inexperience, Obama is not ready for the presidency. It is arguable that McCain, because of his boiling moralism and bottomless reservoir of certitudes, is not suited to the presidency. Unreadiness can be corrected, although perhaps at great cost, by experience. Can a dismaying temperament be fixed?

Now, Kathleen Parker, conservative columnist with the National Review:

As we’ve seen and heard more from John McCain’s running mate, it is increasingly clear that Palin is a problem. Quick study or not, she doesn’t know enough about economics and foreign policy to make Americans comfortable with a President Palin should conditions warrant her promotion.

Palin didn’t make a mess cracking the glass ceiling. She simply glided through it.

It was fun while it lasted.

Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League.

No one hates saying that more than I do. Like so many women, I’ve been pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform brilliantly. I’ve also noticed that I watch her interviews with the held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does. My cringe reflex is exhausted.

Palin filibusters. She repeats words, filling space with deadwood. Cut the verbiage and there’s not much content there. Here’s but one example of many from her interview with Hannity: “Well, there is a danger in allowing some obsessive partisanship to get into the issue that we’re talking about today. And that’s something that John McCain, too, his track record, proving that he can work both sides of the aisle, he can surpass the partisanship that must be surpassed to deal with an issue like this.”

When Couric pointed to polls showing that the financial crisis had boosted Obama’s numbers, Palin blustered wordily: “I’m not looking at poll numbers. What I think Americans at the end of the day are going to be able to go back and look at track records and see who’s more apt to be talking about solutions and wishing for and hoping for solutions for some opportunity to change, and who’s actually done it?”

If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself.

If Palin were a man, we’d all be guffawing, just as we do every time Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because she’s a woman — and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket — we are reluctant to say what is painfully true.

That’s two of the leading conservative voices in this country. And, they’ve realized that McCain and Palin aren’t fit to lead — and certainly aren’t ready for primetime.

Hello? Voters? Are you paying attention?

Former HP CEO and outspoken McCain campaign surrogate Carly Fiorina said that Sarah Palin is not qualified to run a Fortune 500 company. (I would venture to guess that that’s probably true, but that’s a different topic.) Presumably after the McCain campaign told Fiorina that she needed to undo the damage caused by this “foot in mouth” slip of the tounge, Carly took to the airwaves to declare that it’s not just Palin. In fact, according to Fiorina, none of the candidates running for president or vice-president could run a major corporation. As the campaign’s economic advisor, Fiorina has spent a lot of time with McCain, so I guess we can trust her judgement on his abilities. However, she’s spent virtually no time with Obama or Biden, so she’s just guessing … she has no real authority on the subject.

In any case, the whole situaiton is ironic since the statement came from the same woman who was outsted by HP’s Board of Directors. Pot, meet Kettle.

 Update: Maureen Dowd makes the same point in Wednesday’s column.

Carly Fiorina, the woman John McCain sent out to defend Sarah Palin and rip anyone who calls her a tabula rasa on foreign policy and the economy, admitted Tuesday that Palin was not capable of running Hewlett-Packard.

That’s pretty damning coming from Fiorina, who also was not capable of running Hewlett-Packard.

Today, my family has had quite the email debate about Sarah Palin. Clearly, she’s a woman who evokes strong feelings cross the political spectrum. I was surprised to learn that some people think those opposed to Sarah Palin are threatened by her. I think it our opposition to her has more to do with a dislike for her ultra-conservative views and the frightening decisions she would make as the second-in-command.

Apparently, I am not the only person to feel this way. A group of women emailed 40 of thier friends asking them to respond to Palin’s candidacy for Veep. And respond they did. This project gave birth to Women Against Sarah Palin. Less than a week later, more than 100,000 letters have been received. Kudos to this group of regular women who took a stand and provided disgruntled women with an outlet to express themselves. I’d encourage everyone to take some time and read concerns about Palin from real women.

Related to that Huffington Post featured a column today from Rep. Jan Schakowsky detailing what a McCain/Palin ticket would mean for issues normally considered important to women. It’s worth reading.

Next Page »