<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Greater Cause</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prtini.com/a-greater-cause/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prtini.com/a-greater-cause/</link>
	<description>1 part real life PR, 1 part pop culture, 1 part politics ... shaken, not stirred.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ebiddulph</title>
		<link>http://prtini.com/a-greater-cause/comment-page-1/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>ebiddulph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 01:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prtini.com/a-greater-cause/#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>If I can add my two cents, since I also grew up in the same house :-) I think it is simple: Obama chose the best person for the job (vice president and president, heaven forbid there is that need), while McCain did not choose the best person for the job; he chose the person that he thought could get him the most votes.  Obama's choice was for the country; McCain's choice was for McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I can add my two cents, since I also grew up in the same house <img src='http://prtini.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> I think it is simple: Obama chose the best person for the job (vice president and president, heaven forbid there is that need), while McCain did not choose the best person for the job; he chose the person that he thought could get him the most votes.  Obama&#8217;s choice was for the country; McCain&#8217;s choice was for McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather</title>
		<link>http://prtini.com/a-greater-cause/comment-page-1/#comment-999</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prtini.com/a-greater-cause/#comment-999</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that we had such different views. I wonder why that is? You'd never know we grew up in the same house! :)

I think McCain picked Palin hoping women would just vote based on gender and ignore the issues. Obama is sending out Hillary -- who these same women trust and worked diligently for -- to remind them that issues are more important than mere gender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that we had such different views. I wonder why that is? You&#8217;d never know we grew up in the same house! <img src='http://prtini.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think McCain picked Palin hoping women would just vote based on gender and ignore the issues. Obama is sending out Hillary &#8212; who these same women trust and worked diligently for &#8212; to remind them that issues are more important than mere gender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://prtini.com/a-greater-cause/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prtini.com/a-greater-cause/#comment-998</guid>
		<description>two quick things while i'm on lunch. It's interesting to see our reactions to the speeches  of the different parties.  differing policy opinions aside, i found the republican's much more enjoyable to watch.  They greatly overstate the threat to america's national security, but at least they joked around some.      Hated watching the dems though. having nothing to do with their actualy proposed solutions, all they do is complain.  I'm not reminded of what a great country we live in.  every other word out of their mouth is saying how terrible the economy is, how the country is going down the crapper.  I understand if hope is your message you first have to make people feel bad enough to need hope, but yeesh.  I find their brand of fear mongering far more bothersome than the republican's.

my second point is more of a question for you.  I know you seemed particularly offended because you think mccain picked palin just to get women voters.  are you equally offended that obama is deploying hillary and two women governors out to important states to shore up the woman vote?  seems kind of like if he's going to try and sway women that you should be offended at if you want to be consistent.  if you accept that mccain picked palin to get women voters, then how is obama being any different by using women to deliver his talking points so those silly women don't fall prey to palin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>two quick things while i&#8217;m on lunch. It&#8217;s interesting to see our reactions to the speeches  of the different parties.  differing policy opinions aside, i found the republican&#8217;s much more enjoyable to watch.  They greatly overstate the threat to america&#8217;s national security, but at least they joked around some.      Hated watching the dems though. having nothing to do with their actualy proposed solutions, all they do is complain.  I&#8217;m not reminded of what a great country we live in.  every other word out of their mouth is saying how terrible the economy is, how the country is going down the crapper.  I understand if hope is your message you first have to make people feel bad enough to need hope, but yeesh.  I find their brand of fear mongering far more bothersome than the republican&#8217;s.</p>
<p>my second point is more of a question for you.  I know you seemed particularly offended because you think mccain picked palin just to get women voters.  are you equally offended that obama is deploying hillary and two women governors out to important states to shore up the woman vote?  seems kind of like if he&#8217;s going to try and sway women that you should be offended at if you want to be consistent.  if you accept that mccain picked palin to get women voters, then how is obama being any different by using women to deliver his talking points so those silly women don&#8217;t fall prey to palin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
